CITYBLOGGER..PENAFIAN Laman ini tidak bertanggungjawab atas hasil penulisan yang dipetik dari sumbe

What will become of Iraq?

This question can easily be answered: Iraq will be a colony of JSA just like Germany became after WWII. Iraqis will be brainwashed to think Jews are supreme humans and carriers of culture. But must important to the welfare of the Iraqi people and Iraq: all her oil will be transferred into the hands of the globalists. Iraqis will in a few years be dressed in wranglers and eating fast food, listening to the same nigger-music as the western world, gone will be the Iraqi music that flourished under former leaders in Iraq. US will establish military bases in Iraq and defacto govern Iraq. It will not be blue-eyed Americans governing Iraq but people of an Asian-Turk mixture - and they will govern according to the talmud.
Iraqi schools will get new school books written by Jews to fit the new leaders in Iraq - Jews.
Iraq will experience mass unemployment and that in a country that was bombed for weeks by the world most forceful bombs. Iraq does not have sufficient police to protect the people.
Before the war Iraq had very good schools and hospitals. Iraq had a good social security system. When US and UK have finished their destruction of the Iraqi people will be the only loosers - winners will be the Jews.
Germany after WWII
How I can say this with such certainty? Look to Germany and what happened to her after WWII. Germany was the cultural leading country in the world, it had modern and flourishing industry, happy people. Only a few years after the end of WWII Germans started to feel as foreigners in their own country. As soon as WWII had ended US-military started to move German industry and machinery to USA. You should know that all military development America has shown the world - except the atom-bomb - have been based on development done in Germany during WWII. USA has stolen patents and industrial machinery worth more then 100 billion US-$. Additionally US had German POWs working in USA without pay for more then 10 years after the end of WWII.
Germany got new school books after WWII - where the history between 1933 and 1945 was pictured as the years of the devil.
Germans had to fill out papers showing that they had it not been members of Hitler’s party, NSDAP. Those who had been members or had worked for the administration during the Third Reich were refused work in the Germany the Jews established after WWII.
Before the war Germany was a leading cultural country - after WWI Germany was turned into a Jewish republic like what the US was and is.
Democracy to Iraq
Ever since the first speech US-President, Georg W Bush, said US will bring democracy to Iraq and her people. What did US bring to Iraq? A regime far worse than that of Saddam Hussein according to Hans Blix former UN investigator in Iraq.
The Iraqi people did not want to be democratized by neither Jews for US-soldiers. They, Iraqis, did not welcome US-soldiers with flowers as the neo-cons had promised the US administration. In fact they resisted both the invasion and now the occupation.
The Germans did not want to be democratized by jews and US-soldiers after WWII either, in fact the Germans did not want a new government - they were satisfied with the one they had, Hitler and his men. But to Jews the meaning of the people does not count.
Now the Iraqi people have started their final combat to throw out the invaders.
Why do the Iraqi people resist?
The Iraqi people have not failed to notice Article 59 of the new US-engineered Constitution, which puts the new US-founded Iraqi armed forces under the command of the occupation forces, which will, in turn, be "invited" to stay in Iraq by the new sovereign government after the "handover of power" in June. This occupation force will be backed up by 14 large US military bases and the biggest US embassy in the world, tellingly based at Saddam's republican palace in Baghdad. There is little doubt that the resistance will spread to new areas of Baghdad and the south, with the intense anti-occupation feelings of the people turning into more militant forms of protest. The US-led invasion is daily being unmasked for what it is: a colonialist adventure being met by a resistance that will eventually turn into an unstoppable war of liberation.

What went so wrong that the US-led war to "liberate" the Iraqi people turned into the daily slaughter of the victims of Saddam's tyranny? The answer is simple: nothing has gone wrong. Despite the mythology, most Iraqis were strongly against the invasion from the start, though it has taken 12 months for the world's media to report that.
What has changed is that many Iraqis have decided that the peaceful road to evict the occupiers is not leading anywhere. They didn't need Sadr to tell them this. They were told it loudly and brutally a few days ago by a US Abraham tank, one of many facing unarmed and peaceful demonstrators not far from the infamous Saddam statue that was toppled a year ago. The tank crushed to death two peaceful demonstrators protesting against the closure of a Sadr newspaper by Paul Bremer, the self-declared champion of free speech in Iraq. The tragic irony wasn't lost on Iraqis.
Look back to history
For 100 years Britain held Iraq or Mesopotamia in an iron grip. Just see what Churchill, Colonial Secretary from 1921, believed that British bombers could control the dissident Iraqi tribesmen.
Wing-Commander Sir Arthur Harris said, "The Arab and Kurd now know what real bombing means in casualties and damage. Within forty-five minutes a full-size village can be practically wiped out and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured."
For 10 years, the British waged a bombing campaign in the oil-rich and mountainous northeast against Kurdish rebels. Churchill consistently called for the use of mustard gas.
The widespread Iraqi resistance against the Anglo-American occupation is a recurrence of what happened in 1920 when Britain first occupied Mesopotamia - a history that Americans can no longer afford to ignore.
U.S. warplanes and helicopter gunships fired heavy machine-guns, rockets and cannons into the besieged city of Fallujah on April 13 2004..
When Britain first occupied Mesopotamia during World War I they began using airplanes in 1916. By 1919 British planes were bombing civilians to put down the growing insurrection.
The recent "insurgency" in Fallujah - and the use of aerial assaults to punish its people - closely resembles the Arab Revolt of 1920 in which British occupation led Iraqis to put aside their religious and tribal differences and fight together against the British military occupation.
The British military first became engaged in Mesopotamia after the Ottoman Turks granted concessions to Germany to construct railroad lines from Turkey to Baghdad in 1899 and from Baghdad to Basra in 1902. To prevent a German presence on the Persian Gulf, Britain separated Iraq's gulf province from the rest of the country and created its protectorate of Kuwait.
The German railroad to the Persian Gulf was seen as threatening to British lines of communication to India via Iran and Afghanistan, and British oil interests in the region.
Britain needed oil from Basra for its navy. When war broke out with Germany, Britain occupied Basra and seized its oilfields and pipelines, as it does today.
The British conquest of Mesopotamia began in November 1914 with Basra. Due to fierce resistance, however, it took another four years for Britain to conquer the provinces of Baghdad and Mosul.
In the fall of 1915, under Maj. General Sir Charles Townshend, British forces suffered a devastating defeat while trying to take Baghdad. Turkish troops and Arab fighters surrounded and besieged the British garrison at Al-Kut for 140 days.
In April 1916, the 3,000 British and 6,000 Indian troops surrendered - the greatest defeat in British military history to that time. Thousands perished in captivity.
On March 11, 1917, British troops led by Maj. Gen. Sir Frederic Stanley Maude took Baghdad with little resistance. When Maude took Baghdad he issued a proclamation saying, "Our armies do not come into your cities and lands as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators."
The British civil authority, however, was so arrogant that it brought Iraqis together with a sense of national identity and purpose. On May 1, 1920 when Britain received the mandate for Iraq from the League of Nations and established a Provisional Government, the Iraqi people revolted.
With the death of an important Shiite leader in May 1920, the Sunni and Shiite communities put aside their differences and joined forces to resist their common enemy - the British occupiers.
The Iraqi Revolution of 1920 is seen as a watershed event in contemporary Iraqi history. For the first time Iraqis came together in a unified resistance to occupation. Today, Iraqis are working together against the U.S.-led occupation.
Alexendre Jordanov, a French journalist who was released on April 14 2004 after being held hostage for 4-days in Iraq, said he was moved 10 times from one group to another. The groups were different but united against the U.S. occupation, Jordanov said, and had a wide network of supporters in every village.
Britain’s History of Bombing in Iraq
In 1920, after using aerial bombing to quell the Iraqi revolt, the British military government was replaced with an Iraqi Council of State - under British supervision. Britain used aerial bombing against Iraq's Kurds and Arabs when they rebelled against British occupation and even for non-payment of taxes.
On 19 February 1920, Winston Churchill, then Secretary for War and Air, wrote to Sir Hugh Trenchard, the pioneer of air warfare. Churchill wanted gas weapons to be deployed against Iraqi Kurds and Arabs: "I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favor of using poison gas against uncivilized tribes."
Then, as today, a Shiite religious leader, Mirza Muhammad Taqi Shirazi, the Grand Mujtahid of Karbala, led the Iraqi resistance.
The provisional regime lasted until August 1921 when Britain created a client kingdom and installed Faisal Ibn Hussain, the son of the Sharif of Mecca, as King of Iraq. An outsider, Faisal remained dependent on the British for support.
Faisal safeguarded British oil-interests and granted concessions to British companies. In exchange for his services Britain paid him the royal fee of 800,000 British pounds per month.
The British Army first occupied Iraq in 1917 after a three year military campaign in which tens of thousands of British and Iraqis were killed. When Britain was given the mandate over Iraq by the League of Nations in 1920, a violent and popular uprising erupted across the country. Britain's response was to bomb civilian areas with chemical weapons. Kurdish areas were bombed more than 10 years. The British and Iraqis know this history; can Americans afford to ignore it?
Final comments
I want you to ask yourselves what you would have done if an enemy had bombed your house and killed children and women? I would have fought the enemy - and that is what Iraqis do. Ever since the first attack let it be in 1990 or 2003 the bombs were targeting civilian housing. This kind of warfare have been the way of the US and UK ever since Churchill first demanded the British army to bomb a country. And remember who demanded bombing of German civilian housing during WWII.
US and UK have bombed hospitals and schools in Iraq and expected Iraqia to look upon them as liberators. Would you look on someone killing your countrymen and destroying your country as liberators?
In the face of Chutzpah, Jewish audacity and outright lies, resistance must be a national duty.
Heil og sael